Equipment | Andrew Rice Golf

By: Andrew Rice Golf  11/25/2011

Four Generations of Titleist Golf Balls

I was recently handed a pristine collection of older model golf balls. It included a dozen Tour Balata 100’s, a dozen Professional 90’s and a dozen early model Pro V1’s.  There is no arguing that Titleist has held the upper hand in golf balls for almost 30 years and if you have played golf long enough you have no doubt had the pleasure of maneuvering one or all of these models around the course at some point.  After a second of thought, the golf geek in me wanted to take them out for a test drive – see how far they go and what they might feel like.  After all, it’s been a long time since I had dented a Tour Balata.

Thankfully, wisdom prevailed and I decided to get some real numbers on the balls with the help of .  I realized that, including the most recent model of the Pro V1, I had access to four generations of Titleist golf balls.  I had balls from the ’80’s, ’90’s, 2000’s and today and  I wanted to experience first hand what the differences might be.

I needed a very consistent driver of the golf ball and the best man at hand was Zack Brady from .  Zack is an exceptional golf professional who can really play.  He also happens to be one of the better drivers I’ve seen.  I sacrificed six balls from each generation and had him hit them on a rotating basis going Balata, Professional, Pro V1 and new Pro V1.  I did this to negate the effect of any changes in swing or weather.  Zack hit twenty four shots on the Trackman and the average from the six shots with each model was calculated.  Here are the results with each set of balls:

The victims..

Tour Balata 100

Titleist Tour Balata 100

  • Total Distance 261.6 yds
  • Carry 224.7 yds
  • Clubhead Speed 110.1 mph
  • Ball Speed 160.7 mph
  • Smash Factor 1.46
  • Attack Angle -0.4 degrees
  • Spin Loft 9.0 degrees
  • Launch Angle 6.5 degrees
  • Spin 2789 rpm

Professional 90

Titleist Professional 90

  • Total Distance 262.1 yds
  • Carry 251.9 yds
  • Clubhead Speed 110.6 mph
  • Ball Speed 161.4 mph
  • Smash Factor 1.45
  • Attack Angle -1.1 degrees
  • Spin Loft 6.9 degrees
  • Launch Angle 6.5 degrees
  • Spin 2915 rpm

Pro V1 – 392

Titleist Pro V1 - 392

  • Total Distance 286.4 yds
  • Carry 251.9 yds
  • Clubhead Speed 110.1 mph
  • Ball Speed 164.7 mph
  • Smash Factor 1.50
  • Attack Angle -3.0 degrees
  • Spin Loft 10.8 degrees
  • Launch Angle 6.5 degrees
  • Spin 2739 rpm

Pro V1 New

New Titleist Pro V1

  • Total Distance 298.4 yds
  • Carry 271.1 yds
  • Clubhead Speed 110.8 mph
  • Ball Speed 167.2 mph
  • Smash Factor 1.51
  • Attack Angle -3.1 degrees
  • Spin Loft 11.7 degrees
  • Launch Angle 7. degrees
  • Spin 2850 rpm

Things you should be aware of:  The numbers listed above are an average of the six shots struck with each ball.  Each ball was only hit once.  The golf balls, while all pristine and “new” are very different age wise.  The balata balls have been waiting in their sleeve for more than twenty years for someone to play with!  The balls had all been stored in an air-conditioned space and were stored together.  The weather was a crisp 74 degrees with a slight left to right breeze blowing – lovely for August!  Zack used a Titleist D3 9.5 driver with a Diamana ‘ahina X shaft by Titleist.

Points of Interest:

  • Obviously the distance gaps were what interested me most and there were no real surprises there, other than the “upgrade” from the early Pro V1 to the newer model – almost a 5% increase!
  • The huge leap in distance off the tee on the PGATour in 2000 is due to only one thing – the introduction of the Pro V1.  An increase in distance of almost 10% over the scuff resistant Professional.
  • I thought the spin rate on the wound balls (Balata and Professional) would be through the roof.  Not so!  The balls sounded very soft off the face and seemed to struggle to get into the air – almost as if they were unhappy to be put into play this late in the game!  Zack said it felt like he was hitting ping pong balls.
  • I was very interested in the fact that the smash factor was lower with the two softer balls.  It almost seemed as if it was more difficult to get the smash factor up due to the softness/compression of the ball.  BTW, smash factor (generally speaking) is the ball speed divided by the clubhead speed and it measures the efficiency/quality of the strike.
  • The older/softer balls definitely curved more than the more modern models.  This was noticeable even to the untrained eye.
  • Since the study I have gone back and weighed each model of golf ball measured.  I have long been under the impression that all golf balls weighed 46 grams.  The Tour Balata (43gr) and the Professional (42gr) were much lighter than the others (46gr).  Not sure if a ball can “lose weight” or were they made at that weight?

On a side note: I also had Zack hit six older model Pro V1X – 332 balls. I kept this data out of the study as I wanted to key in on four separate generations of Titleist balls and this model was a relative of the early model Pro V1 we studied.  Interestingly enough this was the ball that traveled the furthest - a whopping 307.3 yds!  (All the additional clubhead numbers were similar to the other models). I took from this that it is important to play a golf ball that fits your clubhead speed/game. With a driver speed in the vicinity of PGATour average (112mph), Zack currently plays the new Pro V1X and this study confirmed that the X is the right ball for him.

If your driver clubhead speed is below 95mph you should use the Titleist NXT or equivalent. With speeds between 95mph and 105mph you should be using the Pro V1 or equivalent ball, and above 105mph you should be using the Pro V1X or equivalent.

The moral of the story is that when it comes to golf balls, new technology fitted to the appropriate golfer makes a real difference. Take the time to chat with a teacher or professional you respect and get some sound advice as to which ball might make a difference for you.  Oh, and that pristine logo-ed dozen you’ve been saving for that special course, remember the one your buddy bought back from Augusta for you in ‘78 – eh…not so good.


Other products and services from Andrew Rice Golf

11/25/2011

Long Game | Andrew Rice Golf

The ball should be struck with a subtle downward blow with all shots off the ground, but the driver should ideally be hit with an upward strike for optimal trajectoryand spinpatterns. I will attempt to explain the differences in the direction the clubhead travels (relative to the target line) as it moves both down, and up, into the ball.


11/25/2011

Long Game | Andrew Rice Golf - longgame

Understand that you’re different and unique and if you can deliver the appropriate set of physics to the back of the ball with your swing – it will follow the desired trajectory to the desired location. I now know that there are many ways to swing, yet very few ways to hit – and all the greatest golfers employ those same narrow parameters to hit repeatable, quality golf shots.


11/25/2011

Practice | Andrew Rice Golf

Having hit out of the fescue more than a few times atthis summer I know this for a fact – take a lofted club, aim a little right, swing hard and don’t ever be greedy. There seem to be so many different formulas when it comes to getting out of rough I thought I would share my philosophy in an attempt to simplify your approach.