Car Accidents and Product Failure

By: Law Offices of David Drexler  07/13/2015
Keywords: Personal Injury Attorney, Accident Lawyer, Car Accident Lawyer

Who is responsible in car accidents if product failure is partially to blame?

California’s pure comparative negligence rule divvies up compensation according to the degree of fault shared by drivers, vehicle manufacturers and auto mechanics.

For car accidents, California maintains a pure form of the comparative negligence rule in all personal injury cases. This can be complicated when two drivers and a vehicle malfunction cause an accident. This is why if you or a loved one is injured in a car accident, a car accident lawyer should be contacted at the earliest possible time.

The following different scenarios help illustrate how this works:

A. Driver failed to keep the car in good repair, and that vehicle caused 100 percent of the damages - The operator of the vehicle bears full fault.

B. Other driver kept car in poor repair, but you drove negligently - The court would need to determine the degree of fault that each party bore.

C. Vehicle in poor operating condition, unbeknownst to its driver - Again, the court would need to determine whether the second vehicle’s driver’s negligence caused more or less of the damage, but negligence for the poorly-functioning vehicle would fall to its manufacturer or a car mechanic who improperly serviced the vehicle.

In a pure comparative negligence rule state, as is California, the responsibility for damages depends on the degree of fault attributed to each party. For example, if you drove through a green light at an intersection over the speed limit just as the other vehicle made a right on red, causing the crash, the court may decide you were 30 percent responsible and the second car was 70 percent responsible. You therefore are entitled to receiving 70 percent of the total damages you claim.

In the three scenarios above, pure the comparative negligence rule might translate into the following:

A. The driver with the poorly maintained vehicle would be responsible for 100 percent of your losses.

B. If the court determined the other driver’s poorly maintained vehicle was 60 percent at fault, you would be entitled to having 60 percent of your losses covered by him or her.

C. If the court determined that 90 percent of fault was due to the vehicle malfunction (e.g., the brakes failed), you could collect for 90 percent of your losses. But if the product failure was due to the manufacturer or a car mechanic, you can only recover for economic losses, not pain and suffering.

Clearly, any car accident can be complicated because partial or full fault must be determined. It is therefore imperative to contact a personal injury law firm that specializes in car accidents at your earliest opportunity – timely attention to the accident may help preserve key evidence that can have significant financial consequence.

Keywords: Accident Lawyer, Car Accident Attorney, Car Accident Lawyer, Injury Law Firm, motorcycle accident lawyer, Personal Injury Attorney, Personal Injury Law Firm, wrongful death attorney

Contact Law Offices of David Drexler


Print this page

Other news and updates from Law Offices of David Drexler


Wrongful Police Shootings - What the Law Says

The law is very clear in how it treats police shootings that end in wrongful death or catastrophic injury. The


Preeminent Attorney David Drexler Instructs, Impresses at Prestigious Legal Conference

Renowned Los Angeles personal injury attorney David Drexler delivered a presentation, "Attorney Fee Disputes" at the 36th Annual Convention of


Reasons to Vote "Yes" on Proposition 46

Enacted in 1975, the strict limitations on the amount of money victims of medical malpractice can recover did not prevent


Intentional Torts and Assault and Battery

What does “intentional torts” mean in assault and battery - and how does it affect a damage award in civil


Dog Bites and the Law: Liability Insurance for Dog Owners

Dog Owners Are Advised to Obtain Liability Insurance to Cover Dog Bite Litigation According to the insurance industry, a third


Assault and Battery: Criminal Versus Civil Action

Assault and battery victims can be compensated for their injuries Athreat of violence is criminal, but actual violence carries greater


What Sexual Harassment Claims Can Arise When Co-Workers Date?

Presently, there are no sex harassment laws in California by statutes (under FEHA, the Fair Employment Housing Act) on the


Medical Malpractice: Hire a Trial Attorney

A large percent of medical malpractice cases are handled out of court. That is, the insurance company for the defendant


How a Medical Malpractice Attorney Decides to Accept a Case

The practice of medical malpractice law falls under the area of personal injury law and practiced by a personal injury


Preeminent Los Angeles Medical Malpractice Attorney David Drexler Urges a “Yes” Vote on California P

Los Angeles, CA - October 25, 2014 – Attorney David Drexler, a preeminent medical malpractice lawyer in Los Angeles, is


Sexual Orientation, Discrimination and the Law

A personal injury attorney can play a key role in the bringing of claims against an employer who actively or


More Accolades for Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorney David Drexler

Los Angeles, CA - September 14, 2008 – Los Angeles-based personal injury and medical malpractice attorney David Drexler was featured


Establishing Fault in Slip-And-Fall Accidents

Falls due to an uneven sidewalk or a greasy floor can cause serious injury. Negligent building maintenance may be to


Dog Bites and the Law: Adoption Organization Liability

Adoption Organizations are Sometimes Responsible for Injury-Causing Dogs Pet adoption should not require families to end up hiring a dog