Reasons to Vote "Yes" on Proposition 46

By: Law Offices of David Drexler  06/30/2015
Keywords: Personal Injury Lawyers, Birth Injury Attorney, Dog Bite Injury Attorney

Enacted in 1975, the strict limitations on the amount of money victims of medical malpractice can recover did not prevent the costs of medical care from skyrocketing, as promised by the proponents of the limitations at that time.

The reality is that the burden of having to pay for the medical care of the tens of thousands of patients who become victims of medical malpractice each and every year has landed squarely the shoulders of everyone except the negligent health care providers.

Do you ever wonder why there are so many negligent doctors who are getting away with harming and even killing their patients?

Are you one of the tens of thousands of victims of medical malpractice, yearly, who cannot find a lawyer to represent you in making a valid claim against a health care provider?

The realities are:

1) All medical malpractice claims in California have strict limitations on the amount of money victims can recover no matter how serious the injury.

2) Those limits have remained unchanged since enacted in 1975, 39 years ago.

3) As a result of those limits, there has been a growing number of negligent doctors,

4) You are paying higher health care costs in order to cover the costs of caring for the growing number of patients injured by negligent doctors and

5) You can’t find a medical malpractice lawyer to prosecute valid claims against negligent physicians because the deck is heavily stacked against patients who become victims of malpractice.

Because of the monetary limitations imposed in 1975, if you, a child or a loved one is killed, brain damaged or paralyzed by the negligence of a doctor, you will not be fairly compensated. Your maximum recovery will be only $250,000, the same amount as someone with a much less significant injury. The unfair cap does not differentiate between someone who has suffered a catastrophic injury versus a minor injury.

Medical malpractice cases:

  • Have strict limitations on the proof required to prove a claim and the damages allowed;
  • Are the most difficult cases to win in Court;
  • Have less than a 20% likelihood of success even in the best of cases;
  • Require an extraordinary amount of work;
  • Are extremely expensive to handle, often costing as much as $100,000 in out of pocket expenses in addition to office overhead.
  • While it is very difficult to find doctors willing to testify against a doctor on behalf of an injured patient, there are always doctors willing to testify on behalf of a doctor no matter how negligent the doctor may have been.
Vote “YES” on Prop 46.

A “no” vote on Proposition 46 guarantees that the number of incompetent doctors will continue to grow and that you will continue to bear the cost of treating victims of their malpractice, and, if you or a loved one is ever the victim of medical malpractice, it will be nearly impossible to find an attorney to represent you.

Keywords: Birth Injury Attorney, David Drexler Law, Dog Bite Injury Attorney, Personal Injury Lawyers,

Contact Law Offices of David Drexler

Email

Print this page

Other news and updates from Law Offices of David Drexler

07/16/2015

Wrongful Police Shootings - What the Law Says

The law is very clear in how it treats police shootings that end in wrongful death or catastrophic injury. The


07/13/2015

Preeminent Attorney David Drexler Instructs, Impresses at Prestigious Legal Conference

Renowned Los Angeles personal injury attorney David Drexler delivered a presentation, "Attorney Fee Disputes" at the 36th Annual Convention of


07/13/2015

Car Accidents and Product Failure

Who is responsible in car accidents if product failure is partially to blame? California’s pure comparative negligence rule divvies up


06/17/2015

Intentional Torts and Assault and Battery

What does “intentional torts” mean in assault and battery - and how does it affect a damage award in civil


06/14/2015

Dog Bites and the Law: Liability Insurance for Dog Owners

Dog Owners Are Advised to Obtain Liability Insurance to Cover Dog Bite Litigation According to the insurance industry, a third


06/14/2015

Assault and Battery: Criminal Versus Civil Action

Assault and battery victims can be compensated for their injuries Athreat of violence is criminal, but actual violence carries greater


05/25/2015

What Sexual Harassment Claims Can Arise When Co-Workers Date?

Presently, there are no sex harassment laws in California by statutes (under FEHA, the Fair Employment Housing Act) on the


05/25/2015

Medical Malpractice: Hire a Trial Attorney

A large percent of medical malpractice cases are handled out of court. That is, the insurance company for the defendant


05/23/2015

How a Medical Malpractice Attorney Decides to Accept a Case

The practice of medical malpractice law falls under the area of personal injury law and practiced by a personal injury


05/23/2015

Preeminent Los Angeles Medical Malpractice Attorney David Drexler Urges a “Yes” Vote on California P

Los Angeles, CA - October 25, 2014 – Attorney David Drexler, a preeminent medical malpractice lawyer in Los Angeles, is


04/21/2015

Sexual Orientation, Discrimination and the Law

A personal injury attorney can play a key role in the bringing of claims against an employer who actively or


04/21/2015

More Accolades for Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorney David Drexler

Los Angeles, CA - September 14, 2008 – Los Angeles-based personal injury and medical malpractice attorney David Drexler was featured


04/17/2015

Establishing Fault in Slip-And-Fall Accidents

Falls due to an uneven sidewalk or a greasy floor can cause serious injury. Negligent building maintenance may be to


04/17/2015

Dog Bites and the Law: Adoption Organization Liability

Adoption Organizations are Sometimes Responsible for Injury-Causing Dogs Pet adoption should not require families to end up hiring a dog