Wrongful Police Shootings - What the Law Says

By: Law Offices of David Drexler  07/16/2015
Keywords: Personal Injury Attorney, Car Accident Lawyer, Car Accident Attorney

The law is very clear in how it treats police shootings that end in wrongful death or catastrophic injury.

The U.S. Constitution protects Americans from unwarranted violence, including shootings, from police officers. The rules on when shootings overstep the law are clear.

The infamous Rodney King beating case (1991) was an example of where the "due process" clause of the 14th Amendment affects how police treat suspects in a crime. Certainly, the police sometimes need to use batons, guns and Tasers to apprehend suspects to bring them before a court. But the police are human beings who often overstep the bounds of their authority.

For example, in 2012 an individual was shot dead in Anaheim after running from an approaching police officer. The victim was unarmed and not suspected of any particular crime, which led to community protests.

In large cities, like Los Angeles, so often are suspects shot and killed by police that some Los Angeles personal injury attorneys that practice constitutional law have added wrongful police shootings to their areas of practice. They call themselves “wrongful police shootings lawyers”.

A series of Supreme Court rulings before and since Rodney King have established how the 14th Amendment is interpreted:

What compelled the officer to shoot or otherwise use force on the individual? If a gun was fired, there needs to have been a good reason to do so, such as a crime suspect presenting a danger to the officer or others.

What connected the officer’s need to use force and the amount of force he or she actually used? It’s wrong, for example, when a suspected thief fleeing a crime scene is hit by a barrage of bullets when the suspect has no weapon, particularly if apprehension might occur by other means.

How injured (including fatal injuries) was the individual as a result of the application of force? A single bullet wound grazing the leg is considerable less injurious than multiple shots to the head and torso, leaving the person dead or permanently disabled.

Was forced applied in good faith or was it maliciously and sadistically shot with the intent to inflict harm? For example, bullets aimed at the legs to reduce a crime suspect's ability to run might seem reasonable, but multiple rounds of fire that kill or injure unnecessarily (e.g., at close range) suggest the officer might have overstepped his or her bounds of duty.

This last point, whether or not force was applied in "good faith," is of course very subjective. When shooting victims and their families seek recourse from the police in a lawsuit, the attorneys representing the family need to conduct an investigation with the help of ballistics and other experts to determine if due process was not served.

Contact a wrongful shooting lawyer if you or a loved one were the victim of an overzealous or perhaps malicious police officer.

Keywords: Car Accident Attorney, Car Accident Lawyer, Injury Law Firm, Personal Injury Attorney, Personal Injury Law Firm, wrongful death attorney, Wrongful Death Lawyer

Contact Law Offices of David Drexler


Print this page

Other news and updates from Law Offices of David Drexler


Preeminent Attorney David Drexler Instructs, Impresses at Prestigious Legal Conference

Renowned Los Angeles personal injury attorney David Drexler delivered a presentation, "Attorney Fee Disputes" at the 36th Annual Convention of


Car Accidents and Product Failure

Who is responsible in car accidents if product failure is partially to blame? California’s pure comparative negligence rule divvies up


Reasons to Vote "Yes" on Proposition 46

Enacted in 1975, the strict limitations on the amount of money victims of medical malpractice can recover did not prevent


Intentional Torts and Assault and Battery

What does “intentional torts” mean in assault and battery - and how does it affect a damage award in civil


Dog Bites and the Law: Liability Insurance for Dog Owners

Dog Owners Are Advised to Obtain Liability Insurance to Cover Dog Bite Litigation According to the insurance industry, a third


Assault and Battery: Criminal Versus Civil Action

Assault and battery victims can be compensated for their injuries Athreat of violence is criminal, but actual violence carries greater


What Sexual Harassment Claims Can Arise When Co-Workers Date?

Presently, there are no sex harassment laws in California by statutes (under FEHA, the Fair Employment Housing Act) on the


Medical Malpractice: Hire a Trial Attorney

A large percent of medical malpractice cases are handled out of court. That is, the insurance company for the defendant


How a Medical Malpractice Attorney Decides to Accept a Case

The practice of medical malpractice law falls under the area of personal injury law and practiced by a personal injury


Preeminent Los Angeles Medical Malpractice Attorney David Drexler Urges a “Yes” Vote on California P

Los Angeles, CA - October 25, 2014 – Attorney David Drexler, a preeminent medical malpractice lawyer in Los Angeles, is


Sexual Orientation, Discrimination and the Law

A personal injury attorney can play a key role in the bringing of claims against an employer who actively or


More Accolades for Los Angeles Personal Injury Attorney David Drexler

Los Angeles, CA - September 14, 2008 – Los Angeles-based personal injury and medical malpractice attorney David Drexler was featured


Establishing Fault in Slip-And-Fall Accidents

Falls due to an uneven sidewalk or a greasy floor can cause serious injury. Negligent building maintenance may be to


Dog Bites and the Law: Adoption Organization Liability

Adoption Organizations are Sometimes Responsible for Injury-Causing Dogs Pet adoption should not require families to end up hiring a dog